Some people argue that individual can do nothing to improve the environment. Therefore, only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is universal truth that better clean and neat surrounding is essential for healthy human lifestyles. While, there are number of authority and private industry who are more worries about bad environment. In this essay I am going to examine this question from both point of view.
On the one hand, there are numerous stunning cause that why human not fascinate and responsible for clean environment. Firstly, in today era individual become to more fashionable and hectic in official work like study and job for this reason their no extra time that they contribute in society for cleaning the gardens and roads. Moreover, smart cities where majority of educate and affluent people lives so, they think it's just waste of time and irrespective job. Futhermore, people feel more unconscious or shameless when they to do the cleaning position such as collect to the garbage door to door, getting a low paid salary and more stressful working environment.
On the other hand, now in this era governments and huge industry organized the lectures, seminars and also distributes free pamphlets and books with which community encourage and aware how clean the environment owing to better surrounding more beneficial for society, improve air quality and also support to the wild life. Secondly, in advanced world industry more expanded the pollution in environment with which there are range of aliments born such as blood pressure, eyes weak, headaches and so on. However, if government and large companies provide middle income job inside this fields. For instance, in modern era almost every person used the technology like automobiles, gadgets and so on which are more harmful for environment. If government motivate to individual that they use the bicycle and walk for short distance travel then might be more safe fossil fuels and environment, with people also feel healthy and energetic.
In conclusion, I believe that authority and large industry more contribute and established the plantation devices for clean surrounding, however, day by day community become to more aware so, they also use less water and natural resources.
- The chart below the information that younger one faced the unemployment in five different countries in 2005 82
- Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while other think that it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with discuss both view and give your opinion. 73
- The table chart given the information that Australia family spend the monthly income on household products in two years. 84
- The two pie chart shows to online shopping sales in Canada from 2005 to 2010. 78
- Some parents believe that reading books for entertainment is a waste of time for children and they think that their children should only read serious educational books. What is your opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...panies provide middle income job inside this fields. For instance, in modern era alm...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71538421706 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593567251462 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1515887801 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.384615385 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7692307692 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845286679827 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334474551007 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315816503694 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0460497341967 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292298243726 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.