It is an obvious truth that, lots of species are dealing with extinction and statics indicate an steady enhancement in number of species come under treatment. In this essay I want to illustrate and analyze some practical way of solving problem.
On the one hand, government should have contribution to preserve under treatment creatures. It help to supply the accurate and suitable environment for endangered species, so it can lead to reproduce the deliberate species. For instance there are some zoo in China to fulfill this kind of activity and prevent the extinction of Pandas by preparing enough bamboo, suitable habitation in terms of warmth place, sufficient air moisture and antibacterial living place.
On the other hand, human activities cause a myriad of trouble for our planet that lead to treatment life of wast majority of terrestrial and aquatic creature all over the world. Carbon dioxide that are emitted to air, deforestation, wasting too much water are some example this kind of activity. In order to reduce this types of activity, need an international union wich countries contribute with each other, Moreover they can build new eco system in proper places and protect it instead of ruined habitation.
By and large, the strategies out lined above namely, preservation, reduce harmful activity, and make new habitation can do much to reverse destructive impact for animals and plants, more over in my opinion individuals should have recognition about the relation between all creatures through the world and do their best to contribute with other living things.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 61
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours.Summarise the information. 84
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994, according to United Nations statistics.Describe the information shown below in your own words. What implications do the indicators have for the countries? 84
- The flow chart illustrate the consequences of deforestation.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features.Write at least 150 words. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ng with extinction and statics indicate an steady enhancement in number of species...
^^
Line 2, column 95, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... preserve under treatment creatures. It help to supply the accurate and suitable env...
^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'zoos'?
Suggestion: zoos
...te species. For instance there are some zoo in China to fulfill this kind of activi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for instance, kind of, by and large, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25196850394 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81283163806 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.653543307087 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.637560951 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.222222222 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2222222222 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0668624056838 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271615748228 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383652775405 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447205218848 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350542028686 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.