The graph compares U.S. energy consumption by 6 distinct form of fuels between 1980 and 2030.
Overall, the highest amount of fuel which people used it in this period is petrol and oil form and by a considerable gap the lowest consumption rate belongs to hydro power fuel form.
According to the graph, the petrol and oil consumption in 1980 was 35 units. After a fluctuation between 1980 and 1995, the consumption of this form commenced to rise. Estimates reveal that by this steady growth rate, usage of petrol and oil will reach to near 50 units in 2030.
As you can see, coal and natural gas are second and third popular fuel forms in this graph respectively. In 1980 amount of natural gas was more than coal but evaluations illustrate that by this trend of consumption, coal will use 30 units in 2030.
Following these 3 fuel forms, by a significant gap, there are three other forms such as nuclear, solar or wind and hydro power fuels. According to predictions, after a fluctuated rate for hydro power fuel during previous years, the trend of its consumption will be constant and it will be approximately 5 units in 2030.
- Some people think that only the government can make significant changes in society while others think that individuals can have a lot of influence What is your opinion 71
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- Now children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time doing sports. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development? 73
- Meadowside village and Fonton development over three periods (1962, 1985 and the present) 73
- In recent years, there has been a considerable rise in crimes committed by young people in cities.What has caused this? What solutions can you suggest? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will be approximately 5 units in 2030.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70854271357 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61938740433 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2780675597 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132258866552 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763319875089 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073172080997 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100820533535 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831980997098 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.