Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
n my point of view, this statement is unsustainable, ecologically and economically talking. By this I mean that if some country is growing exclusively based in increasing your production, he will need more countries consuming and purchasing what he is producing. Then, I think that no one should depends on others countries to make your economy expand. Other hand is that producing more goods will affect environment in negative way, boosting climate changing.
Understandably, a few people assume that elevating the number of goods and materials in production to increase some economy’s nation would be important. Otherwise, there is a solidly way to do it. Actually, most relevant economies in international scenario are investing in creativity and innovation instead of just produce each time larger number of goods. South Korea, for instance, began to invest in high technology products to sell them easier in international markets. They’re producing smartphones and cars such as Samsung and Hyundai. These goods must require specific technological abilities; and this is changing the way other countries are seeing Koreans.
In my opinion, other negative side of production of large number of goods is the price of transportation and delivery of them. Indeed, countries that have been produced a large number of materials instead of high technological ones, have problem with the infrastructure to transport it. Brazil and China are examples of this fact. They need reliable roads, different modal transportation and larger infrastructure generally talking. They already have been invested in this, however it’s not been enough because they truly depend on the tremendously high number of good to make their economy keep sustainable.
I would argue as well that producing more products instead of investing in creativity is contributing to worsen climate and environmental issues. If people are consuming more, this means they are producing numerous trash either. Our plastic garbage have been, mostly, unfortunately, left in ocean and seas around the world; and this is causing undeniable problems to these echo systems as well.
Therefore, I would say that I disagree a hundred percent with that sentence. I truly think that investing in specialization and research for new ideas are much helpfulto make some country’s economy grow solidly and reliably. There many varieties of problems that can been caused by this kind of production; and I believe that it should be avoided as soon as possible by them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-17 | Yuri Manata | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | Yuri Manata | 73 | view |
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poor nations. Rich countries should pay more attention. 67
- Some people believe that government should make investment in building public libraries in every town, while others think it is a waste of money because we have access to information via internet. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- A few people think that invest public money in libraries is pretty important for a city otherwise some people think that this might be a waste o money because they already have easy access to internet. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion. 78
- Improvement in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poor nations. Rich countries should pay more attention. 67
- some people think that universities should provide with konwledge and skills needed in the workplace .Others think taht the true function of a universityshould be to give access to knowladge for its own sake ,regardless of whether the course is usefull to 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n my point of view, this statement is un...
^
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
n my point of view, this statement is unsustainable, ecologically and econo...
^^
Line 1, column 298, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...ucing. Then, I think that no one should depends on others countries to make your econom...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('solidly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('way') instead of another adjective.
...would be important. Otherwise, there is a solidly way to do it. Actually, most relevant econo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of goods is the price of transportation and delivery of them. Indeed, countries ...
^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...deed, countries that have been produced a large number of materials instead of high technological...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 269, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
.... There many varieties of problems that can been caused by this kind of production; and ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i mean, i think, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44050632911 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10605778065 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562025316456 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8535351943 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8095238095 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158017676086 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046691487941 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383784028068 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914994811019 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374886942078 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.