The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table illustrates how much money the consumers spent on different goods in five distinct countries(Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey) in 2002.
As we can see, people in these five countries spent their money on three kinds of items: Food/Drinks/Tobacco, Clothing/Footwear, and Leisure/Education. Of the three sorts, Food/Drinks/Tobacco cost the consumers the most money and Leisure/Education the least money.
Among the five countries, Turkey had the highest expenditure on Food/Drinks/Tobacco—32.14%, while Sweden the smallest ratio—15.77%. However, as for Clothing/Footwear in the five states, the situation was different. Italians spent more money(9%) than any other people. Still, Swedish spent the least money(5.40%). Although Leisure/Education played the smallest role in the five peoples’ expense, the exact expenditure in these nations showed different ratios. 4.35% in turkey was the largest proportion and 1.98% in Spain the smallest percentage.
Overall, it can be seen clearly from the table that Food/Drinks/Tobacco cost the largest amount of money of the three kinds and Turkey spent the most money on it among the five countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Noah1997 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | shayma | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | phungnguyen1611 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later, some people think that they are the best people to talk to school students the danger of committing crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 56
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 61
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 84
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89349112426 4.92477711251 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.22867080827 2.65546596893 159% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556213017751 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7887540778 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150948558708 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601086671164 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071822775671 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113295340603 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802531006018 0.0819641961636 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 11.4140731707 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.