It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be.
Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.
In more recent decades, we have seen a growing recognition that people in the family today are less close than they were in the past. This essay will discuss the main explanation as well as suggest a possible solution to this problem.
Even though there could be various reasons, I believe that the hectic pace of life gets blamed for mainly contributing to the issue mentioned above. It is an indisputable fact that people are now spending much more time working rather than being with their families. A doctor, for example, spends inordinate time periods at the hospital, so she is unable to join with her son in the formative years of child’s development. This example makes it clear how busy working is capable of preventing people from taking part in their family activities and then leading to damage family connections. Thus, there is an obvious link between hectic work schedule and the weak family ties.
The amount of time that we spend together is the keystone for building a strong family relationship, so to bring family members closer, people must spend more time-sharing feelings and supporting each other. My family has a custom of having lunch together at the weekend, so we manage to enjoy a great time participating in family activities from cooking traditional dishes to having long interesting conversations. In this way, such reunion events give people with ample opportunities to tie the family connections which could be loose because of not seeing for a long time.
In conclusion, it is clear that the lack of time spent together plays a crucial part in people’s attitude toward family value today, and family reunions need to be organized more regularly to improve family relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-24 | brandey | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-25 | Nguyễn Hương Giang | 67 | view |
| 2015-08-02 | Sypirzada | 70 | view |
| 2015-07-30 | Behzad.Pajang | 80 | view |
| 2015-07-09 | youcandoit | 70 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 78
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment block. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages than disadvantages? 67
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 78
- The following bar chart illustrates the mobile phone ownership in ten European countries throughout the year from 2005 to 2010 92
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that government should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06293706294 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77976206152 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611888111888 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2062132049 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.636363636 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239425558119 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0932217124462 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426595728657 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15263031394 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00802835926123 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.