Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of avoiding over packed products by consumer and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that extra packaging of products can be a plus, and I will discuss views and relevant examples that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, overpacked products can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of complex issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. As per my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this remarkable phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, overpacked products might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of unnecessary usages pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is negatively correlated with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this common phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of overpacked products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-13 | greatrin | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | Sidra018 | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-17 | ajayvermaETP | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-19 | lalacamargo1 | 77 | view |
- The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change? 88
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work? 77
- medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. to what extent do u agree or disagree? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71863117871 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16780472434 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653992395437 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6529289107 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172520433138 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552204000389 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687049700524 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0952473653643 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745093381045 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.