Nowadays over packaging on products on consumer products have raised a pertinent question as to whose responsibility is to avoid over packaging. It is said by many that it is consumer's responsibility to avoid such extra packaged products; however many believe it is producer's job to reduce extra packaging. This essay will discuss both the points and offer logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why over packaging of products should be avoided by consumer and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that over packaging causes environmental pollution. As it is known that packaging requires plastic and other material which are not easily degraded . For instance, poly bags need more than one thousand years to be completely decomposed. Moreover, consumers pay extra amount for extra or attractive packaging . Therefore, to control the environmental pollution and to save extra money ., consumers should avoid over packaging of products.
On the other hand, many people believe that it is product owner's jobs to refrain from extra packaging of products. One of the main reason for this is rooted in the fact that product owners create the need of certain thing by exposing to consumers. Moreover attracting packaging attract large number of customers. For instance, any gift owner shops always do the attractive packaging to their clients. Producers can easily stop this practices which will help in reducing the price of products and pollution.
After analysing both the side, it can be concluded that one of the main focus should be pollution which can makes life miserable for everyone and by avoiding extra packaging we can help the cause. I think it is everyone's responsibility be it consumer or producer to protect environment.
- Does the advent of internet change the role of the teacher To what extent do you agree 90
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 72
- Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor incommunication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea. 77
- Do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages? 11
- The only thing that interferes with my leaning is my education- Einstein. What does he mean by that? And do you think he is correct? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r material which are not easily degraded . For instance, poly bags need more than ...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...amount for extra or attractive packaging . Therefore, to control the environmental...
^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...mental pollution and to save extra money ., consumers should avoid over packaging...
^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to save extra money ., consumers should avoid over packaging of products. On ...
^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...certain thing by exposing to consumers. Moreover attracting packaging attract large numb...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...de, it can be concluded that one of the main focus should be pollution which can makes lif...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...ain focus should be pollution which can makes life miserable for everyone and by avoi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for instance, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25795053004 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84766544626 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526501766784 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2749728957 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8666666667 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315541586927 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113305843438 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087165295705 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203462479565 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663746031303 0.0609392437508 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.