Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

Essay topics:

Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.

These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about over packed products in the market. It is irrefutable to say that over-packaging has become a trend in today's competitive world. With many people claiming that it is a serious problem to society, others reject the notion. In my opinion, it should be the responsibility of the producers to limit the wastage of resources in the form of unnecessary packaging. The below essay assets both side of the contention and provides a plausible conclusion.

To begin with, there are myriad of reasons, which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that the cost of the over packaging is actually added to the product sold. The type of packaging found in pharmaceutical industries can be taken as an example here. Pills and tablets are packed in much bigger and colorful strips than needed. According to startling research, for example, around 90% of people are selecting the product based on quality and durability, not based on the packaging.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that some goods have too much packaging and these packaged goods industry is highly competitive, and it's manufacturers are under immense pressure to come up with better solutions to compete in their market. As a tangible example, some market research undertaken by a prestigious analytical company has asserted that packaging plays a vital role in the selling of a product in the markets.

Taking all these points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that manufacturers are more responsible to avoid the over-packaging the goods as it would be wasting consumers money for no practical benefits

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-13 greatrin 80 view
2019-07-09 Sidra018 88 view
2019-03-17 ajayvermaETP 80 view
2019-01-28 daniel.bakhsheshi@gmail.com 88 view
2019-01-19 lalacamargo1 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, so, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10869565217 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95425637849 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615942028986 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4158665625 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212475618056 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654586297219 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358851285755 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118153863596 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230029576425 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.