The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The two maps provide information about the roadways to the city hospital in two different years (2007 and 2010). there were significant changes noticed in the infrastructure while comparing both years roadmaps.
According to the first map, in 2007 on either side of the hospital road thee were six bus stops presented, three on each side and the parking places for both public and staffs were same which situated in the south-east area of the hospital road.
On the other hand, as per the 2010 roadmap lots of changes in the road layout to the hospital. there was two new roundabout constructed in both ends of the hospital road. The bus stops were removed and a new bus station was build in the south-west region of the hospital. The entrance and exit way from the bus station was connected with the roundabouts. In addition, the parking space was separated and the new public car parking section was constructed in the north-east region of the hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...l in two different years 2007 and 2010. there were significant changes noticed in the...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re while comparing both years roadmaps. According to the first map, in 2007 on e...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e south-east area of the hospital road. On the other hand, as per the 2010 roadm...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...ges in the road layout to the hospital. there was two new roundabout constructed in b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 795.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81818181818 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59282048935 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515151515152 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4878626474 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.375 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245619250551 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111791891188 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137151276418 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183527457717 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788224541846 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.