the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery.
On the overall, there is a significant change would be made if the proposed plan being conducted.
First and foremost, the exhibition space will expand and get the majority of free spaces. This means that the structure of the floor will change. Precisely, walls separate between two temporary exhibitions and permanent exhibition will be replaced to keep the big hall as an open space for permanent exhibition. On the left-hand side of it will be utilised by changing it into a special exhibition room. At the foot of the stairs is planning to use for the exhibition store.
The front space which is Parkison court is the only part that keeps unchanged. However, there is a small reposition in the main entry door, moving it to the front of the main exhibition room, faced to the court.
Nonetheless, the lobby and office room are now turned into the education area and a small store further down the end of the room as well as an unnoticeable change in the entry door material.
- the internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed, but it has also created problems that did not exist before.What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solution can you suggest? 56
- the diagrams below show existing and proposed floor plan for the redevelopment of an art gallery. 78
- A post on Facebook asking for an arrangement 22
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the mainfeatures, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nonetheless, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74418604651 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63227667162 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7787878669 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1111111111 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0911588321192 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0404224272579 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420200319258 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0514562340105 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037800735559 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.