Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Work is the most important part of our daily lives. The efficiency of a society is measured by the degree and the quality of its work. Actually, people attitude towards work of several hours a week is varied from person to person. Although many would argue that work three days a week for long hours is the most important to nation building and personal life. In my opinion, work five days a week for a few hours has a great impact on a person life and his family. I would like to mention two reasons based on my general facts to support the argument.
The first aspect to point out is that many benefits quickly stem from work shorter hours a week. Admittedly, little hours works have a close tie-in motivation and creativity. I would like to mention noteworthy research conducted by CSR institute in India. The discovered result suggest that Seventy-Five Percent of the people indulge themselves in their work for a shorter time because it is will a positive effect on their lives and also their family. For example, I remember when I was a child usually I saw my father come back to home after work and he did not take extra time in his work because he need to spend much time with me and my mother which helps us to enjoy time and thinking to achieve our goals. Furthermore, the father has a great importance on the quality of one's life.
Secondly, there has been a positive correlation between the survival of my parents with me and being successful. I still affirm the same idea because there is no guarantee that spending a plethora of time with my father contributes to the widening horizon, which will influence profoundly on me and family at all. My own experience is a compelling example of this I remember when I was in a secondary school I usually shared my father to solve homework with me which is created a good environment when I graduated from my university among me and him. I need to mention a proverb in my country, that said: "Likewise nuts need that dirt environment to grow, children need their father with them for growing and becoming a valuable person". Consequently, parents are great teachers to build character. Particularly, their children.
To draw a conclusion, taking what I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that work is omnipresent in our daily life but work for a shorter hours a week better than work a long time for a day because it will affect to the family life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- TPO-36 3
- The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being repl 80
- TPO-14 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specific reasons and examples to support 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 780, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...as a great importance on the quality of ones life. Secondly, there has been a pos...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67010050904 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497685185185 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.8146573319 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.157894737 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2304743452 0.236089414692 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745945861279 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078906077281 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17244338009 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876850156671 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.