In the past people were more friendly than they are today. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
One people's social relationship with others is the most important aspect of his life, and to some extent determines the life he lives in. Nowadays, some people claim that in comparison with past, people now do not treat others around him friendly enough. I strongly agree with such statement for the following reasons.
The increasingly competitive and stressful society have driven people to become more concerned about their own benefits. In the past, there were not so many people and the capacity of our society was enough to provide everybody with the equal opportunity. But now, the condition has been changed dramatically. Our society is no longer able to support the increasing number of people. As the consequence, in order to live a better life or to avoid falling behind, people today have to try their best to pursue every chance to improve themselves. That is why people become more indifferent about other people's feelings and benefits than in the past. Therefore, people become less friendly not because of selfish, but due to the contradiction between a growing population and limited social resources.
Besides the more competitive society, the advanced communication technology has contributed greatly to the decrease of friendliness. In the past, we usually share our feelings with the person who live closely with us, like our parents or our neighbors. The more feeling we share with others the closer relationship we will enjoy, thus, we would be more concerned about the people around us. But now, the Internet have connected people all around the globe, and it seems that we live in a big online community, where we can chat and communicate with each other without being blocked by the time and distance. Although it seems that we have more friends and more relationships, the number of people we really care about or the people who care about us is decreasing. Since we no longer live together like in the past, we usually do not have the common things that we are both interested in to talk about and also would not be willing to sharing our true feeling with others. So, the advances in the communication technology are also essential factors that make people less friendly.
From what have mentioned above, people today do become less friendly than in the past. But, this tendency results from the development of society and there is no way to avoid it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-09-10 | tedyang777 | view | |
| 2023-05-09 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-21 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- A government spends money on a training course that train adults after the age of 25 in the most up-to-date skills in the workplace. Do you think it is effective? Why or why not? 90
- In the past people were more friendly than they are today Do you agree or disagree with the statement 68
- Agree or disagree: It is as important for old people to study and learn new things as it is for young people. 85
- Do you agree or disagree it is easier for parents to raise their children today than 50 years ago 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:Scientific discoveries should be shared globally, and the government should not keep them as secrets. Use specific details and examples to support your answer.. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
... thus, we would be more concerned about the people around us. But now, the Internet have connected p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, really, so, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 401.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95012468828 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65752818974 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511221945137 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0679439878 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1052631579 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305567505723 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100940339402 0.076458572812 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0807425429457 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201777780782 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343991931458 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.