Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People are of opposing beliefs about Science increasing span of human life from 100 to 200 years in near future. This clear divide stems from varying mindset that people have towards the science and the world.
Disbeliever of this view are of opinion that depleting quality of life is no good reason for one living longer. They refuse it owing to the belief that longer life comes at a price and is only a wishful thought; a price that is healthy prosperous life, a price to see this heavily armed world full of wars, fatal diseases, environmental issues and lack of family support. According to them, the survival in this world running into global warming poses a burden. World is strongly empowered with chemical weapons that threaten the very own human existence and are dream-killers of a long healthy and happy living. It is also the idea of fatal incurable diseases such as Cancer and HIV Aids that shatter their confidence in the later age. They believe that as they grew older, they would be left at the mercy of caretaker homes and thought of being away from their families sounds hurtful.
On the other hand, if we try to look through a different lens, there is still a large group of people who really endorse and are happy with the opportunity to live longer that Science will offer them sooner rather later. They bring an opportunistic mindset where time is money which could be efficiently used to further equip and modernize the world. According to them, the extended life will give them a chance to fulfill their dreams of witnessing all the future scientific brilliance and advancements. They might get a chance to land on the moon or fly to outer space and visit far-off galaxies. Some of these people are also glad that they will have more time to spend with their families.
I think a life averaging 200 years would be no different from its 60 years counterpart, if it took the same course. Important is have a purpose in our lives and a good one, an extended period would allow to serve that purpose given that we channel our energies in the right direction. Scientists and researchers can carry and end their studies during in their lifetimes and world problems could be solved. On the contrary, a destructive mindset can do no good even if given an extra 100 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | bhk1987 | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-09 | 09bitrkhan | 78 | view |
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Science will soon make people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Some people believe it is a good thing while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...f it took the same course. Important is have a purpose in our lives and a good one, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'serving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: serving
...ood one, an extended period would allow to serve that purpose given that we channel our ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, really, so, still, i think, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69306930693 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42555566061 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.838742472 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160358271084 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503247338771 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522374754523 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100615956142 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406466501253 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.