Nowadays, selecting the best candidate for any job could be difficult for many employers. It is often argued that while doing job interviews, employers must focus on acquired degrees and relevant experiences instead of considering personal qualities. However, I disagree with the statement given and believe that educational requirements and number of working years should be considered by employers before hiring a candidate for any job.
The primary reason for considering qualifications is that often educational degrees help employers to decide that the candidate has the skills required for a Job. In other words, educational certificates are used as a measurement tool for assessing how individual would perform in corporate world. While, I concede that many employers think that personal qualities like physical abilities, such as lifting weights are important, but these are often required by blue collar jobs, whereas white collar jobs may require office skills which are attained by completing educational degrees. However, this could be better understood by looking at an example of a job of a computer operator. Employer may select best candidates by simply looking at their computer certification in different computer programs such as Microsoft excel or any certification for typing speed. Furthermore, if candidates have such type of certification on their resume, it could be a sort of surety for an employer that candidate possess the right set of skill for a Job, which an employer is looking for.
Another reason due to which employers should pay more attention towards the number of work experience because employers want to judge candidates’ expertise in a relevant field. This is because there could be certain jobs with required skills that possibly be acquired with the number of working experiences. This could be better understood by looking at an example of a job of a surgeon. Despite relevant qualifications of mbbs, liver transplant is done by those surgeons only, who have performed such surgeries in their past. Overall, previous working experience help employers to select right candidate for the right job by simply looking at how they have performed in their previous jobs.
In conclusion, employers should emphasize more on qualifications and experience because it helps them to decide that candidates possess relevant skills and outperform at workplaces.
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. give your opinion with relevant example. 73
- The best way to tackle the problem of obesity is to educate people about healthy eating To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree. give your opinion with relevant example. 11
- while recruiting a new employee the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities rather than qualifications and experience To what extent do you agree or disagree give your opinion with relevant example 85
- Successful sports professionals can earn a lot of more money than people inother important professions. Some people think that this is fully justified whileothers think it is unfair.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, whereas, while, in conclusion, sort of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2040.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48387096774 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02029497816 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486559139785 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2961893851 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149545371548 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628178045858 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566852740081 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12017959642 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332362343339 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.