Talent is instinct or educational?
In recent years, international super stars of sport or music have been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world due to their substantial impact to young generation and controversy of their talents being main instinct, main training. Although some people give that success of athlete or musician is linked to completely instinct, others seem to concentrate on their practicing programs during their journey.
There are number of reason why to believe that instinct is one of imperative factor making it possible athlete or musician to produce desirable learning outcomes. First, almost athlete or musician will get accustomed to taking their expertise easier manner. For instance, Ronaldo or Messi player can achieve considerable goal productivity even accomplishing a myriad of complex skills as easy as it sounds for other guys at the same condition. Second, talent is unique format for some magic performance making audience feel satisfactorily and therefore they can earn money a lot when they are so young. By the way, some talents become milionare from their advertised contact or their high salary.
Nevertheless, education is more beneficial for their sustainable success in the long run. In fact, training programs contribute to enhance their ethic except their expertise. If players rely their talents heavily without constitute firm fundamental, they will easily fall into fraught with pitfalls society. In addition, they will more understand their strength and know how to improve from their basis to master level. Likewise, they have talents but it is only limitation due to interacting environment lead to decline their outcomes day by day.
In conclusion, talents have to be combined between instinct and education, success will be sustainable. Government should have some solution to detect talents and training program must be applied them as top priority within development of sport or music sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | rajwinder.12 | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 82 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Nguyễn Thế Linh | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-12 | Nguyễn Thế Linh | 84 | view |
| 2018-09-01 | Timothyy12 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce, Ronaldo or Messi player can achieve considerable goal productivity even acco...
^^
Line 2, column 657, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some talents become milionare from their advertised contact or their high salary....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, likewise, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43853820598 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81385738833 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654485049834 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2767003197 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.928571429 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206943244208 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684371040021 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538139974127 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12638264777 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292490018248 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.