A lot of countries on the globe offers few people high salary. Part of a significant number of people think that it's for the countries growth. While some people suggested that the government should deprive workers to attain sky-high salaries and be regulated to only reach a maximum specific range. This essay will portray these views, followed by a logical conclusion.
On the first hand, people who already attained the peak of the career tend to have higher salary than others. These kinds of people already had surpassed a lot of trials which eventually lead them to develop the skill set of their field of job. For example, senior programmers needed to master various design patterns, coding standards and system architecture. This professionals also leads the team and teaches newbies to finish their assigned tasked well. Skills like these are the key to the company success and even one of the keys to a developed country. Thus, I do believe that gaining this kind of skills and responsibility is ideal to be paid a higher salary.
On the other hand, people think that with the government authorities should intervene and create a max attainable salary across the country. An approach like this could have a positive impact to the people since all employees across the nation will have the same income according to their level, thus, allowing each individual to grow synchronously with other people in terms of finances. But this will might lead to a catastrophe since high skill individuals will most likely plan to migrate to another country who pays an ample amount of money base on their competence4.
To conclude, while high wage gainers tend to have special skills and greater obligation which they do deserve, it is also inevitable that limiting the salary to a certain extent could help country inhabitants to have the same growth in all job types. With all of the details presented above, I believed that people must be paid accordingly to their skillset for the countries growth and the government must not be involve itself to this trend which can cause a ruckus.
- Using a computer everyday can have more negative than positive effects on young children. Do you agree or disagree? give reasons and relevant examples. 89
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced? 78
- Many small, local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with large supermarkets in the area. How does this affect local communities? How could this situation be improved? 93
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...number of people think that its for the countries growth. While some people suggested tha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 362, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ding standards and system architecture. This professionals also leads the team and t...
^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... the same growth in all job types. With all of the details presented above, I believed tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...d accordingly to their skillset for the countries growth and the government must not be i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94318181818 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.567880111 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0724602125 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270501217906 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927077957207 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680828986806 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172615006121 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695634596879 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.