It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.
What are advantages and disadvantages of this development?
With the new developments, scientists and tourist can travel far natural environments like south pole. This essay will argue these travels' advantages and drawbacks.
First of all, if we look at advantages of travelling far places like south pole, we can say that researches that are done by scientists are vital for human beings to learn more about our world because it is known that only 10 per cent of south pole has been discovered by us and we have learned a lot of things from this 10 per cent such as ancient creatures had lived on earth before million years ago. In addition, south pole is the one of the closest place to the center of the earth, that's why collecting information from there is essential to learn more about our world's core because it is what keeps this earth alive.
When it comes drawbacks, these days more and more company take tourists to such places which are hard to reach and go. As a first sight it can be seen a really good opportunity to see places like that, although these companies and agencies, who takes people to far natural environment, do not care about eco system that we live on. For example, 2 years ago a travel company caused icebergs to break and fall apart from main land on south pole because they took too much people to climb main land in order to get extra money. This made those ice melt quicker than ever before and destroyed some of creature's home. Therefore, we can say that sometimes our small actions can cause big drawbacks both us and the other living things in our wold.
To conclude, travelling to natural environments sometimes can be beneficial for us to learn about our world but just because of that people should not destroy where we live at since if this place is disappeared one day, we disappear either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | neethujithin | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Jonkun | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-15 | Mr.Strange | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-29 | vinusharma27 | 89 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole.What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 73
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 81
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 68
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 79
- Many people now undertake extreme activities from hang gliding to mountain climbing Why do people risk their lives in this way and do you think this is a good trend 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...ent creatures had lived on earth before million years ago. In addition, south pole is t...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 489, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...osest place to the center of the earth, thats why collecting information from there i...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...and on south pole because they took too much people to climb main land in order to g...
^^^^
Line 7, column 590, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the creatures') or simply say ''some creatures''.
Suggestion: some of the creatures; some creatures
... quicker than ever before and destroyed some of creatures home. Therefore, we can say that someti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 242, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sappeared one day, we disappear either.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, really, so, therefore, apart from, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6144200627 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38128580933 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573667711599 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.6100936094 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.2 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23249008761 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100479726643 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708943419911 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170362450119 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082647112171 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.05 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.