The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should wr

Essay topics:

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.

The bar graph illustrates incident and injury rates per 100 million passenger miles travelled according to types of transportation in 2002.

Overall, most of the accidents and injuries occurred in demand response vehicles while commuter rail vehicles had the least figures.

In the graph, it can be seen that demand response vehicles by far the greatest figures with just over 250 incidents and approximately 175 injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled while commuter rail vehicles had the least units with around 25 incidents and 20 injuries in 2002.
When it comes bus's and light rail's figures, it is obvious that they have the same incident numbers with almost 75. However, number of injuries which happened on light rail significantly smaller than bus's figures (40 and 70 respectively). Also, it can be said that heavy rail second safest transportation with 50 incidents and 40 injuries.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-24 lordwind 73 view
2019-11-03 phuongmi 61 view
2019-10-28 kallgou 73 view
2019-10-10 neethujithin 61 view
2019-09-01 Jonkun 67 view
Essays by user adonis31 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31724137931 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76504424539 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1127738435 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216085568563 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118717498368 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116356101504 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15860347339 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125620947263 0.0819641961636 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.