The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)
2005 Present 2025
Hamburgers 40 38 51
Fried Chicken 35 37 45
Salads 5 15 41
Fried Rice 6 9 9
Noodles 6 8 9
You should write at least 150 words.
The table illustrates, the average amount of junk food consumed by people is divided into 5 categories (Hamburgers, Fried Chicken, salads, Fried rice and Noodles) in Melbourne. It’s between the years of 2005 – 2025. The units are measured in numbers.
Overall, the junk foods eaten by people like Hamburgers has increasing value and predicted to top the list by year of 2025, Whereas Fried chicken is second to hamburgers also having increment. Meanwhile, Consumers eating healthy foods like salads has gradual incline which would reach nearer the foods top on the list. Finally, Foods like Fried rice as well as Noodles has the least amount.
In terms of, Hamburgers it top the list having of 40, and predicted to reach 51 units by 2025. Meanwhile, Consumption of oily foods like Fried Chicken is having values nearer to hamburgers it is 35 and 45.
On the other hand, Healthy foods like salads is having least amount of 5 units in year of 2005, but by observing, it will have gradual increasing value around 41 by 2025. Finally, Fried rice and Noodles Ranks low on the list, were both having fluctuating values of 1 unit (6 – 9).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-10 | phoaiphuthinh | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | arjnaga | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | ravitejacts | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-03 | Võ Ngọc Trang Thanh | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-19 | vijayvj1 | 56 | view |
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Pres 69
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language.Discuss both these views and give your o 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tops'?
Suggestion: tops
...ast amount. In terms of, Hamburgers it top the list having of 40, and predicted to...
^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the least'.
Suggestion: having the least
...ther hand, Healthy foods like salads is having least amount of 5 units in year of 2005, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, second, so, well, whereas, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79695431472 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48682270174 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517766497462 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3482229488 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137418814822 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650730009409 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405108175366 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0972764002551 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349770022829 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.