Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is obviously true that the more modern the society is, the more traffic and transportation woes are. While it is said that the migration of people from outer edge to within the city should be considered a plausible solution, I totally disagree with this notion for the reason below. At the same time, I will suggest some reasonable solutions.
First of all, city is regarded as the heart of the city. It means that a lot of choose this place to settle down. Thus, overcrowding and overpopulation are really inevitable. If the migration currents entering the cities increase, many issues such as unemployment, the shortage of housing and so on will arise. In general, it seems that this solution is taking us to a dead end instead of completely solving the problem.
Therefore, something must be done to address this before it is too late. Firstly, the government ought to upgrade the road facilities in both cities and rural areas to eliminate bottlenecks which hamper traffic flow. Dwellers need to be encouraged to utilize public vehicles such as bus, metro and so on so that the number of conveyance will decrease especially during peak hours. The Construction Department must have serious sense of work in lieu of the irresponsible working attitude which can lead to tragic accidents of citizens due to low-qualified road or broken bridge.
To sum up, I think that it is not a good idea to stimulate people to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. Everybody should have responsibility for improving traffic system so that wherever people are living, it does not have traffic problems anymore.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-20 | thuybeo25092002 | 67 | view |
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communications, such as letters, emails, or telephone calls.Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 89
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 92
- Some people think that sports involving violence such as boxing and martial arts should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions To what extent do you agree 61
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is obviously true that the more moder...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l suggest some reasonable solutions. First of all, city is regarded as the he...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad of completely solving the problem. Therefore, something must be done to ...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...low-qualified road or broken bridge. To sum up, I think that it is not a good...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, really, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, i think, in general, such as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 1.00243902439 998% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 5.60731707317 392% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 273.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95238095238 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84309498508 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 106.607317073 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.6279783751 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5714285714 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264453515059 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705692287449 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859107073865 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15179684925 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110682541115 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.