Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this.

Certain organizations have a practice of taking employee opinions for their goods and services. Some people believe in this practice while others don't. This essay is about the pros and cons of such decisions from an employer.

Accepting employees opinion while taking decisions will benefit the employer in many ways. Experienced opinions from employees are an asset to any employer. For example, a seasoned cook in a hotel chain will be having a good insight into customer preferences. Implementing the ideas of such workers can often benefit an organization.

Integrating employee opinions within the business decision making have its fair share of problems too. Sometimes employees may not have enough broad view about a situation to formulate an opinion and considering their point of view on such scenarios can cause problems to the management. As an example, take the case of a sale representative with limited exposure in the automobile industry. If the employer is taking such employee's outlook in a decision-making process related to the automobile industry, it is can cause harm to their business.

In conclusion, although there may be some side effects in taking employee opinions in the decision making process, the advantages of such a decision outweigh the problems that are caused by it.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e believe in this practice while others dont. This essay is about the pros and cons ...
^^^^
Line 6, column 11, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ecisions from an employer. Accepting employees opinion while taking decisions will ben...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 424, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ndustry. If the employer is taking such employees outlook in a decision-making process re...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94745653064 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.511173533 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1666666667 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.25397266985 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301168441596 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110228540386 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0872370393214 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198052876751 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753380001314 0.0609392437508 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.