Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Easing the incidence of road casualties continues to be controversial as many people are struggling with. While people claim that the principle solution to alleviate traffic injuries penalizes harshly who breaks the law, others believe that there are more other valid methods to enhance road safety. In my view, the conjunction of punishments and a range of other measures can be applied to promote better driving habits.
Proponents of stringent punishments for driver offences argue that it is deterrent which spurs traffic users to drive more cautiously. People would have a propensity to avoid the same offence duplication if they see penalties from others. There are various types of driving penalty, such as small fines, license suspension, driver awareness courses, and even prison sentences. Furthermore, the aim of these punishments shows how dangerous actions and negative consequences drivers have caused. As a result, these drivers become more disciplined and alert, following the rules more carefully.
On the other hand, I believe that safe driving may be encouraged in several different approaches that do not punish drivers. Firstly, we should raise awareness and adequate education about traffic laws before they start to drive via publicity or in school or even as part of an extended. Secondly, safe road design with appropriate signs paid more attention. For example, signs can be used to warn people, speed bumps and road bends can be added to calm traffic, and also speed cameras can help to deter people from driving too quickly. Finally, government and local councils should invest to improve public infrastructure capacity, which incentive locals to absent using private transport.
In conclusion, while punishments support to diminish bad driving, I believe that other road safety measures should also be introduced
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | wardiati | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Garrett | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-27 | mohammad.iraf | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | do tuan tu | 56 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The table below gives information about the underground railwaysystems in six cities. 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 11
- the amounts of waste produced by 3 companies over a period of 15 years 67
- Cinema attendance by age group 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
... that safe driving may be encouraged in several different approaches that do not punish drivers. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...blicity or in school or even as part of an extended. Secondly, safe road design with approp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44947735192 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74547656855 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648083623693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8020824629 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.714285714 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317727907709 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996649178652 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526433630912 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185383223774 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391149835819 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.