Tpo-32-1
The reading explains a number of reasons for quackers phenomenon, but the professor rejects these reasons.
Firstly, the text claims that the strange noise had been created by male and female ocra whales, however, the professor argues that this whales are detected by the submarines sonar. Moreover, this whales are living near the surface, while the submarines usually are moving in the deeper parts of ocean.
Secondly, the text argues that the second theory is related to giant squids. while, the professor opines that squids were detected in 1960 and after that for two decades were reported.
Eventually, the last theory which is mentioned by reading is related to foreign submarines, conversely, the professor elucidates that old submarines could not change their direction suddenly, while quackers sounds change direction quickly. In addition, submarines in the past had engine noise which could be detectable by another submarine. While these days, they have used new technology not in the past.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and ex 63
- TPO 37-1 3
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 70
- Tpo 32-2 3
- TOEFL T P O 40 - Integrated Writing Task 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'submarines'' or 'submarine's'?
Suggestion: submarines'; submarine's
...es that this whales are detected by the submarines sonar. Moreover, this whales are living...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...cond theory is related to giant squids. while, the professor opines that squids were ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 1373.03311258 62% => OK
No of words: 158.0 270.72406181 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38607594937 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 4.04702891845 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51730909045 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 145.348785872 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 419.366225166 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2941928294 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283608414198 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108924135017 0.0996497079465 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462142709607 0.0662205650399 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138617020289 0.162205337803 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718144359944 0.0443174109184 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.