The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The given chart depicts data about the changes in the number of visitors to three London museums such as British, Science and National History during the period from June to September 2013.
It can be clearly seen that, the number of visitors to Science and National History museums almost converged two times. Also, it is obvious that British Museum is rates not only experienced a huge rise but also dropped dramatically. Throughout the period the absolute maximum of visitors was registered in British Museum. The lowest point of the given diagram was registered in Science Museum.
Looking at the details, it must be said that British Museum climbed up from 600 thousand visitors in June to about 700 thousand in July. During the period from July to September the line sank to approximately 500 thousand people, but then surged to about 650000. By contrast, such museums as National History Museums and Science Museum did not have such tremendous changes as the previous one. The former dipped from about 550000 in June to almost 400000 in July. After that, the line had almost a constant climb until September with around 480 thousand visitors. The latter also dropped from June to August from 400000 visitors to 300000. By the end of the given period the line leaped to approximately 450 thousand people in September.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-07 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
- In some societies, the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment. 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 61
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 61
- Today more and more people choose ready to eat food rather than cooking themselves. Do this development have more advantages over disadvantages? 84
- Life cycle of the silkworm and silk cloth production. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, then, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1104.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97297297297 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43616663651 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 327.6 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6849438665 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280897916104 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104663389851 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747019086262 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220332504767 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860905103608 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.