The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010.
The given charts depict data about how much food was consumed by Chinese citizens during the period from 1985 to 2010.
It can be clearly seen that the salt line converged with the meat line. As for fish chart, the line reached a peak in the end of the given period.
Looking at the details, it must be said that salt and meat consumption had a downward and an upward trends accordingly. The former started in 1985 with almost 500 grams per person per week and was sinking until 200 grams, where two lines were crossed in 2010. By contrast, the latter began with around 100 grams.
As for fish line, it is clear to see that this graph were growing from slightly more than 600 to about 700. After that it returned to 600 grams per person per week in 1995. During the next 15 years this graph were climbing up until 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Kien Vu | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | windingsilverfish | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | ochirvaani | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Vadim | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | Vadim | 61 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 78
- In some societies, the number of crimes committed by teenagers is growing. Some people think that regardless of age, teenagers who commit major crimes should receive adult punishment. 73
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 84
- Testing on animals medicines for human. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where releva 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...om slightly more than 600 to about 700. After that it returned to 600 grams per perso...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, look, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 669.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34415584416 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.93171722971 2.65546596893 73% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 179.1 283.868780488 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3021720006 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126226286639 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469322429091 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561206473932 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793281303312 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619563189646 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.6 13.2329268293 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.6 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.