Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Some people enjoy the mobility of driving car on the road, so they think that governments should spend more money on repairing roads. While some people think it is more important to spend money on constructing railways. I, personally, support the point that governments should cost more money to build railways.
There are several problems people who drive on the roads would be faced with. Firstly, traffic congestion at rush time is one of the big problems which always takes people more time on communicating between company and home than casual time. Also, there are more and more fatalities in traffic accidents owning to driver’s thoughtlessness, or their wrong concepts in road usage. Besides, cars, buses or other vehicles may pump out emissions that would damage to environment and also be harmful to people.
Therefore, it is more crucial to urge governments spend money on railways. Constructing a good train system can attract people to take trains during rush time, so the problem of traffic congestion can be released. The less cars on the roads, the less likelihood of accidents. Hence, such system can effectively reduce the number of cars on the road because most of people are going to take train to communicate. Moreover, there will be less pollution from vehicles, so the system would release environment degradation.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that spending more money on railways is a necessity to governments. It brings more benefits to not only people but also environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nayan Soni | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Motu | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | Saahaar | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | Mampee | 73 | view |
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Nearly every new building is designed by an architect nowadays Some people believe that is important for a building To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld spend more money on repairing roads. While some people think it is more important ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 219, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...traffic congestion can be released. The less cars on the roads, the less likelihood ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... the number of cars on the road because most of people are going to take train to communicate....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'communicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: communicating
... most of people are going to take train to communicate. Moreover, there will be less pollution...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 247.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16599190283 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82876322071 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566801619433 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3724336295 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1428571429 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124346044636 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548138925224 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617693698714 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870439768548 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574495528354 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.