In many places, new homes are needed but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not built new homes there.
What is your opinions about this?
The role of the countryside in developing a new residential area is contentious in many places. While some people consider the countryside as the only option for developing new institutions, I believe that it is better to leave the countryside intact.
On one side, People advocate that establish new residence in rural areas is the most efficient way to settle the demand for housing from the public due to inefficient land in the city. A good example to demonstrate was the development of new town in France at 1990. There was a surge of immigrants and refugees coming to France in 1990. The French government decided to set up a new residential area in the countryside in order to settle the demand for housing. And it was so successful and became a good demonstration for the other countries which were experiencing with a similar problem.
Although the development of the countryside seems to be the most effective solution to remedy the housing issue, I believe that there is a better solution to resolve the problem. To begin with, the government can reconstruct the old buildings in the town centre. In fact, according to statistics, the utilization rate of land in the town centre is comparatively low. The government should consider rebuilding the structures which are under 10 storeys to a taller one. Secondly, the authority should rethink the usage of land in the city. It may be more practical to demolish those industrial buildings in scarcely low usage rate and develop it to new estates. In return, the government can benefit from better use of precious land resources in the city.
In sum, though the housing problem is crying for a solution, and developing new homes in the countryside may be one of the possible solutions, I believe that it can be solved by rebuilding old architectures and rearrangement of land use.
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable.Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheapand clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- More and more people are opting for ready-made food instead of freshly cooked food. Are there any advantages or disadvantages to this? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Forests are the lungs of the Earth. Destruction of the world's forests amount to death of the world, we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, second, secondly, so, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90705128205 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99925855126 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477564102564 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5770568222 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.066666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20423670934 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671420706465 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717534139646 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146562513234 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796095479168 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.