Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne. The maps show the town's
development over a period of time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The maps depict the changes in Melbourne’s small town named Tarnagul over one century.
In 1900, the town was not much developed. It has one orange and mandarins farm and also one diary. There was a very little town area in the center of farmland. After 50 years, the town was quite progressed and focused on farming. There are orange farming in the north and east side. As well as lemon and grapefruit produced in the west side. There is also Railway track and some parking shed in the south side of town. But the town area had been expanded more than 20%.
In the 21st century, the whole look of this town has been changed. It had wildlife sanctuary in the west side. Both farmlands were empty and own town area was also shrunk. But there were many developments in the south side. It has a park along with tourist shop and on the other side of road parking shed are converted into a local museum and craft market. The track has been removed. Road and river stay same over 100 years.
- Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne The maps show the town s development over a period of time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples. 77
- Tarnagul is a small town near Melbourne. The maps show the town'sdevelopment over a period of time.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 93
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference.to what extent do u agree or disagree? 61
- Should university deduct the student's score for the late submission assignments.discuss? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43169398907 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16767078215 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568306010929 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 22.4926829268 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6021715103 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 50.6875 112.824112599 45% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.4375 22.9334400587 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.5625 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129317009212 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438836026068 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490461837805 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114091297493 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536563831137 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.2 13.2329268293 39% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.69 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.23 11.4140731707 63% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.86 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.9970731707 58% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.