Science could help people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Would that be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Advancement in technology is helping mankind with longevity through its break-through discoveries. This has both positive and negative aspects which I will discuss in the subsequent paragraphs; although, my thinking incline towards the optimistic view.
One the one hand, the consequences society might have to face, with the research in this field, is the increase in aged population. This will deteriorate the balance, as community will have low youth count which culminates in limited work-force. Consequently, the nation as a whole, will be generating much low revenue for state affairs, while on the other hand, government will have to spend enormous budget for the facilitation of elders such as construction of old-aged homes, pensions and health care. This condition has clearly been observed in Japan where they had to limit the resources spend on people above 65.
On the other hand, this evolution will provide benefits, foremost of which is the healthier lifestyle which people will enjoy. As the discoveries are backed by nutritional researches which not only establish a diet routine but also serve the basis for effective food utilization. For instance, restaurants in Germany follow strict nutritional values helping the nation in both above mentioned fields. Additionally, people will be able to avoid diseases which cause excruciating pain and misery. For instance, scientists are developing drugs for cancer which have allowed tremendous amount of patients to recover.
In conclusion, improvement in health sector will eventually lead towards an increased lifespan. While this could cause both benefits and drawbacks, I, however, believe that the disadvantages are eclipsed by the advantages which is the achievement of perfect physical health and cure of diseases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | VivianL | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | Adewumi Akinwale | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | Adewumi Akinwale | 84 | view |
| 2019-02-03 | John_elia | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-16 | harry0880 | 56 | view |
- People think that it is more important to plant trees in towns and cities than to build more houses. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Some says that the government should not spent the money on the art because music and painting for example are not making people's life becoming better. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Should old people live with the family or separately with same aged people 72
- Housing shortage in big cities can cause severe social consequences Some people think only government action can solve this problem To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Science could help people live up to 100 or even 200 years. Would that be a good or bad development? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consequences'' or 'consequence's'?
Suggestion: consequences'; consequence's
...timistic view. One the one hand, the consequences society might have to face, with the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57875457875 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96007867684 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622710622711 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.078498266 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.153846154 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0806282896215 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312028182421 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278509895727 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541231909716 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252876051707 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.