The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
The two provided bar charts illustrate information comparing percentage of population who had health problems from three weight issues ( underweight, overweight, obesity) inhabiting in the city of Charlestown during 1955 to 2015 and this also includes a proportion of citizens whose health condition was fine. Looking at the bars, we can see that the changes of weight problems among people of different-age groups were significantly varied over six decades.
It is interesting to see that the youngest age group between 20-29 had the lowest percentage of weight issues, with more than seventy per cent being assessed to have a good health condition in 1955. In comparison, the inhabitants in their 60s had a striking problem of underweight approximately forty per cent while people of 40s had a problem with excess weight around over twenty per cent. Obviously, obesity in this period was considered a the fewest case of citizens' problem in weight assessment.
In 2015, the percentage of healthy body weight still belonged to citizens of early and late 20s age which was 65 per cent more than the proportion of people in their elderly age in the same year. Obesity, on the other hand, was indicated a a major weight problem in the oldest age group with about sixty per cent instead of underweight issue that had less than fifty per cent of overall population. In this year of 2015, the increase of unhealthy condition in Charlestown inhabitants was very apparent.
To summarise, it was obvious that citizens in their 20s of both compared years had the smallest number of weight problems while elderly people in 2015 tended to have more and more unhealthy body weight especially with obesity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kallgou | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 61
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...health problems from three weight issues underweight, overweight, obesity inhabit...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
..., obesity in this period was considered a the fewest case of citizens problem in weig...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
...esity, on the other hand, was indicated a a major weight problem in the oldest age ...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...esity, on the other hand, was indicated a a major weight problem in the oldest ag...
^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
...esity, on the other hand, was indicated a a major weight problem in the oldest age ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06785714286 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7612270823 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514285714286 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.8521898226 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.666666667 112.824112599 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1111111111 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192442953318 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914635940912 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406807979639 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136195076721 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341325332176 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.