Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In the contemporary world, the relationship plays a prominent role because we meet a variety of people in our routine lives; which includes friends, family, and office colleagues. So there has been no shortage of debate about the maintaining of good relations. However, the question is does telling truth important for relation? Some people believe it is not necessary to honest every time because we need to say lies sometimes to overcome the difficulties. On the other hand, I personally feel it is necessary to be veracity for reasons I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, If a person is honest, he definitely gets huge respect in society. Although honest people probably face challenges, overall they consider as important people. My Friend Ram is the best example to illustrates this. When we were studying at Omak public school, He was elected as a school union leader. Even though sometimes his honest behavior hurt the students such as complaining students mistakes to the teachers and they punish the students. Overall, everybody in the school gives respect because of his genuine attitude. All this possible with is a true relationship with other students in the school.
In addition, telling truth build long lasting relationships in people. If the employee in a company honest with his boss, he always trusts him and gives value to his voice. My personal experience is the best example to illustrates this. When I was studyingMaster's in Pharmaceutical Sciences I was very honest with my pharmacology professor and I never said single lie with him which build a strong relationship. What more, he recommended in one of his friend's company in the United States.
In conclusion, although some people probably disagree with my idea, I fell telling the truth always creates a good relationship and great respect in society. So, I suggest everyone be honest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
- the argument on the online edition of the encyclopedia. the reading claims that online edition has several drawbacks over traditional books. 81
- four day work week vs five day work week 60
- four day work week vs five day work week 81
- The widespread use of the internet has given people access to information on a level never experienced before. How does this increase in the availability of information influence life in today's world?" 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s friends company in the United States. In conclusion, although some people prob...
^^^
Line 4, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iety. So, I suggest everyone be honest.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1977.66487455 80% => OK
No of words: 310.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08387096774 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91212971547 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9173661692 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9473684211 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155654681094 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485210397396 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557431575892 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102328548848 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334684863645 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.