Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.
Truth has always been a conversation of much value. It is always discussed whether it's right to always tell the truth or not. Individuals have always given thought about this question based on the variety of human morals, religion, and even their way of thinking. Philosophers also had their ideas on the matter. Emanuel Kunt as an example, believes that people should always tell truth no matter the result or consequences. People break into two groups towards his claim. They are either with the idea of always being truthful or they completely against it.
I believe we don't need to always be right with people which I will be demonstrating in the latter.
Being always truthful with everyone can and most likely will hurt people feelings. There are situations that the truth will cause more damage to the person than the falsehood that we decide to tell them. As an example on the reason when someone needs emotional support and asks us whether we can visit them or not, we don' need too be frank and can just manage the situation with a simple affairmation. When they're asking for our presence they most likely don’t want to hear our actual reason why we can't visit them and they will feel more joyfull with the white lie we had given them.
Secondly, always telling the truth in some cases can be harmful. In cases when the truth can cause an individual's death, no human in their right mind would tell the truth. For example, if we're in a situation that our truthfulness can be damaging to someone else’s livelihood, we better led on with a lie. Governments tend to surface parts of the truth based on political and safety matters. Whether that the said information will or will not hurt the country and the society they will decide on the amount of the facts they will let surface. As an example when at war, no news containing the amount of damage won’t be getting out.
As a conclusion of this passage, I completely disagree with Kunt’s Idea of always telling the truth and will count myself in the latter group concerning Kunt’s theory. People feel pressured to always tell the truth only because they are concerned about what the society will think of them and make the decision containing their own morals. Under good and humane reasons individuals can hide parts or even the whole truth if nessecary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- professor disagrees with the passage that says traditional encyclopedias are better than the communal online ones 80
- Passage believes dinosaurs are endotherms professor disagrees 83
- why does the professor disagree with teamwork 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 14, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ey completely against it. I believe we dont need to always be right with people whi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 328, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to be'?
Suggestion: to be
...r we can visit them or not, we don need too be frank and can just manage the situation...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...uation with a simple affairmation. When theyre asking for our presence they most likel...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 500, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t want to hear our actual reason why we cant visit them and they will feel more joyf...
^^^^
Line 6, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...l. In cases when the truth can cause an individuals death, no human in their right mind wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7371007371 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39051566293 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498771498771 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2477563903 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8095238095 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.380952381 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230171739981 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941029390209 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760723235095 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150111994757 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613925808295 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.