The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The two pie charts offer information about the share of oscar winners in 2003 and 2008, depending on seven different film genres.
Overall, it is clear that in both years, 2003 and 2008, the most popular film genre was thriller, despite its dramatic decline, whilst comedy was the last public’s option, remaining at almost 5% of the total number of oscar winners.
In more detail, in 2003 thriller represented about half of the total percentage (approximately 46%), but after that the number fell dramatically to almost 35%. similarly, Horror decreased by almost 5% over the five years period, from 13% to approximately 8%. On the other hand, Action recorded a dramatic growth from 17% to 21%. In the same way, Science Fiction almost doubled its percentage in this period, reaching about 16% in 2008.
In contrast, the other three film genres, comedy, Romance and Documentary remained approximately the same in both years, increasing slightly only by 1-2%.
- Reading fiction is more pleasurable than watching movies. Do you agree? 61
- Decisions often prove to be the crucial turning points of our lives so a person should never make any decision alone Do you agree 77
- The table below shows causes of injuries in Australia for teenagers and the general population 87
- With a global culture evolving some people feel that traditional music is getting superseded by international music Do you agree 76
- Modern life has changed the old mindset of many people of getting up early Do you prefer to be one of them or you believe in rising early 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding on seven different film genres. Overall, it is clear that in both years,...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the total number of oscar winners. In more detail, in 2003 thriller represe...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Similarly
...number fell dramatically to almost 35%. similarly, Horror decreased by almost 5% over the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... period, reaching about 16% in 2008. In contrast, the other three film genres...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, in contrast, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1974522293 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69413952204 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4938872841 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.571428571 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146194735883 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675298152444 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979626015302 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11119141534 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110526401025 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.