five days work week vs four-day work
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not four-day work week benefits the company and the employee. While the reading states shorter work week advantage both company and worker, the lecture refutes this, saying that four-day work week won't affect company profits and economically and the lives of employees.
First of all, reading claims shorter work week workers get enough rest which leads to fewer mistakes and the company can hire new employees without spending extra money because full-time workers working for less pay. However, the lecture argues that the company should spend a lot of money. Furthermore, the professor states that although the company doesn't pay salaries, it needs to spend money on training, insurance, space, and computers; which cost a lot.
In addition, the passage makes the argument that shorter work-week reduces unemployment. full-time workers can shift their work to a new employee. The professor counters this point by stating hiring new employee cost more to the comapny and they prefer other options. According to the professor, corporate force employee to do overtime to make up the work and they expect the same as five-day work, as a result, no additional jobs and the current job become unpleasant.
Lastly, The reading passage posits that less work week people get enough time to spend with family and other personal work. The lecture refutes this, by point out that although more leisure time, it is riskier and decreases workers quality of life. Moreover, the professor says, shorter work week reduce work stability and has a chance to lose a job in the recession. On top of that, the company likely promote a five-day working employee for frequent monitoring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | maryka72 | 60 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | Hibahtabbaa | 70 | view |
| 2023-02-27 | kevin1105 | 66 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | Hibahtabbaa | 60 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | can111 | 3 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- Which technology has changed your life the most? Use examples and reasons to develop your argument. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
- rococo architects impact on nineteenth century 3
- summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they contradict points made in the reading passage. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...he reading and the lecture both discuss whether or not four-day work week benefits the company...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 351, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...fessor states that although the company doesnt pay salaries, it needs to spend money o...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Full-time
...shorter work-week reduces unemployment. full-time workers can shift their work to a new e...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 8, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... current job become unpleasant. Lastly, The reading passage posits that less wor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, while, in addition, as a result, first of all, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 15.1003584229 7% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 52.1666666667 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44757272515 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 212.727598566 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.58824541 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401299631207 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161281503568 0.076458572812 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126645419129 0.0737576698707 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277679293059 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117603604751 0.0645574589148 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.