Some people think teaching children with different abilities benefits everyone while others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While many people state that an ideal class would be contained mixed-ability student, the rest claims to group children according to ability, which means brilliant children would study in the independent and proper environment. From logical and analytical judgments, both statements have different perspectives, but personally I prefer to learn in a mixed class. In my essay, both sides of this argument will be discussed.
On the one hand, relevant to mixed-ability model, the equality or justice are likely to be perceived by a majority of learners in terms of ethics. Moreover, the class with a diversity of student's levels makes an incredible win - win situation as the distinctive student could have more motivation to achieve their target while the others are expected to get more efforts to be better. In respect of drawbacks, a high-level group may lack the chance to challenge themself and progress with tough questions if teachers follow proper one for average students. For example, to solve a Science task, the clever need less time in comparison with others.
On the other hand, concerned with streaming method, some schools separate students according to their academic ability in order to cater those students with an appropriate curriculum. In detail, high-level groups may absorb faster while lower-level groups could only benefit from a slower pace. Additionally, by this method, teacher could design more challenging lessons to enhance knowledge of bright students. Nevertheless, a negative impact of streaming on students are inevitable. It is clear that no one wants to be considered as a less intelligent than others so that grouping children could damage students' self-esteem.
In conclusion, the influence of education on human's live are critical and profound. As individual demands are varied so that learners should be careful when choosing studying environment. About my opinion, mixed class is highly praised and the distinctive students could take part in extra classes to make the enhancement facilitate their abilities better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-14 | mimeomahong85 | 80 | view |
- Some people think it is more important to plant trees in open areas in towns and cities than to provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 55
- In some countries, there has been an increase in the number of parents who educate their children themselves at home instead of sending them to school. Do you think the advantages of this overweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Many students are taught to push themselves and try hard to be better than their classmates rather than work together for everyone s benefits Do the disadvantages of training students to be competitive outweigh the advantages 75
- Some people think teaching children with different abilities benefits everyone while others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment Discuss both views and give your own opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to study'.
Suggestion: to study
...earners should be careful when choosing studying environment. About my opinion, mixed cl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41744548287 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93935363239 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610591900312 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7584131648 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172724620536 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518612331279 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423238646322 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104166398983 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038210494032 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.