Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is believed that nowadays people have many selections. In some cases, it is a good thing to have an ability to choose from a variety of choices. I entirely agree that individuals can have many options.
Naturally, there are some people claim that it is against evolution. Moreover, it is said that it was better in the past when technically everyone was as a farmer. I disagree with this idea because to have variety of choice is beneficial. Take for example a job. Everyone has a special ability or lovely type of work, which comes by hobby. These individuals have rights to choose what they will do every other day as an employment. Another example is gastronomy, people can eat their lovely dish because every person has different preference. Furthermore, even in one family, members have distinguish food choice or allergies to some products and in this situation to have range of selection are better.
However, there is one area where people have too many choices. This specific area is television. Some people or children spend their whole daily time watching it. Whereas, they have a chance to go outside and do some useful activities. These people wasting their time watching television because there are too many channels. From this point of view, I would say that we have many choices.
In conclusion, I would say that people have too many different choices. In some cases, it is advantageous to have variety of choice while in other areas it has drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Dungphung | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | BIBHU KALITA | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | pateldhruv1708 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | geforce | 61 | view |
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- the graph below shows changes in the distribution of average household income between 1965 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 85
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 56
- The chart below shows the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 591, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'distinguished'.
Suggestion: distinguished
...rmore, even in one family, members have distinguish food choice or allergies to some produc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...usion, I would say that people have too many different choices. In some cases, it is advantage...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86111111111 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63347098677 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519841269841 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6265475455 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.4736842105 106.682146367 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2631578947 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415499567806 0.244688304435 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126089152595 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916761100047 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261526961251 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573772372434 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.02 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.