Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
In today’s era there is a massive competition where everyone want to be ahead of others and in this race we have forgotten what could harm our environment and our health. Over packaging food consumption has become a very big concern which has to be taken care at the earliest. We have individual responsibilities to be played from consumers and producers perspective.
Firstly from producers perspective , they have desire to see their products being popularly sold in the market and to beat other competitors they spend more on packaging rather than quality of the products which they sell. Irrespective of the fact that the packaging material they are using might not be disposable or might be consuming extra papers resulting in more deforestation, they are concentrating more on packaging with least concentration on the product inside the package. This is resulting in less expenditure in product quality and more in packaging.
On the other hand consumers, who have made an assumption of products to be good if the packaging is good and poor if the packaging is simpler have giving birth to such over packaging culture , hence it’s advisable we should start picking up the products based on quality and not based on colour or design of packaging . Because over packaged products are not only being sold to us with extra cost but also the quality of products are given least importance and are hindered.
To conclude with “Together we stand, divided we fall” is correctly proven here , since we should come out of blame game and together build a pollution free environment by sticking to quality of the products and not getting attracted by its external appearance as a consumer and on the other hand producers should adhere the rules and ensure appropriate packaging is done to retain the quality of the product alone and not for giving external beauty to the product.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- Design of buildings have postive or negative impact on people's life and work. 55
- Government should allocate most educational resourses on science subject. Do you agree? 65
- “Normal” societal roles for women include taking care of the children in the household. But now that women contribute equally in outdoor responsibilities, it would be a little unfair to expect the same amount of dedication towards the upbringing of th 55
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 55
- Around the world, solar energy is becoming a more popular source of energy for many households. Why do you think this is so? What are the advantages and disadvantages of using solar energy to power one’s home? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e. Firstly from producers perspective , they have desire to see their products ...
^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the least'.
Suggestion: with the least
...hey are concentrating more on packaging with least concentration on the product inside the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing birth to such over packaging culture , hence it's advisable we should sta...
^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t based on colour or design of packaging . Because over packaged products are not ...
^^
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'given the least'.
Suggestion: given the least
...st but also the quality of products are given least importance and are hindered. To conclu...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d we fall' is correctly proven here , since we should come out of blame game ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04458598726 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8993574264 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 20.5024630542 166% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 121.233271724 50.4703680194 240% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.0 104.977214359 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.8888888889 20.9669160288 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267799826975 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118058695148 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592626518636 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164200805047 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425284725369 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.3980295567 150% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.