'Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.' How far do you share this viewpoint?
It is believed that people should support charity by donating a fixed amount of their income. I agree with this statement for some reasons that I will explain in this essay.
Firstly, perhaps, one major reason is that charity brings us closer to the world that we want to live in. The impossibility to live without some fundamental necessity materials to accommodate other's life would lead to stable environmental condition. This will create better place to live. Furthermore, giving is good for mental happiness. Studies of older people show that those who give support to others live longer than those who don’t.
I do appreciate the opposing view which argues that recipients of charity are unorganized and the charity does not know their individual identities. However, I believe that such drawback would be overcome through organizing the charity that identifies the receiver of the charity.
In conclusion, it seems to me that people should support charity by donating a fixed amount of their income. This is because charity brings us closer to the world that we want to live in and makes us happier. Above all, though, clarity should be well organized to meet the right purpose.
- In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially by younger people. Is this an acceptable development or something that we should try to prevent? 56
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. What are the advantages and disadvantages? 56
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. How far do you agree with this proposal? How important is it for a child to learn a foreign language? 56
- Illiteracy continues to be a concern for many countries in the world today. What are the causes of illiteracy in the modern world, and what effects does it have on the people concerned and society as a whole? 61
- It is unfortunate that most languages are on the verge of dying but that is the price of progress. Some see this as something that occurs inevitably while others say that it is an acceptable development. There are arguments on both sides which I will elab 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 197.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08121827411 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65610804441 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583756345178 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 506.74238477 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.403703492 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4166666667 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4166666667 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167209582467 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684936048904 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889628316312 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121590793755 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822229091794 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.