The chart provides information on the number of fast food eaters in the USA from the year 2003 to 2013.
Overall, most of the Americans ate fast food once a week or once or twice a month while frequency of people who ate on daily basis and who never ate fast food remained low throughout the year.
As seen in the chart, within ten years of span those who ate fast food was below 5% and same goes to the people who never ate. About 17% of American people enjoyed fast food several times a week in the year 2003 which increased by few percentage in 2006 and came down to nearly 15% in ten years. In the year 2003, 31% of Americans were eating fast food and there was slightly risen in 2006. Within ten year number reduced significantly to almost 26%. Almost one third of American ate in fast food restaurants once or twice a month in 2003 which reduced to 25% in 2006 before it drastically increased to about 32% in 2013.
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems. 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourist travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 67
- Look at the figures for the proportion of people involved in agriculture as shown in the pie chart 79
What modification I need to
What modification I need to get 7 on the essay
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... food remained low throughout the year. As seen in the chart, within ten years o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'risen'.
Suggestion: risen
...eating fast food and there was slightly rose in 2006 which then reduced significantl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.24855491329 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19289324437 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514450867052 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.6356421266 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369154078952 0.215688989381 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210280981719 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608306006914 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277456196813 0.15604864568 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447974794213 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.96 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.