The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers.
The bar diagrams give information about the principal purpose of education among students of different ages, and how much support they receive in terms of day offs or financial assistance from their employers.
Overall, it is clear that the main reason for study among younger students is to build a career, whereas, older students are more inclined towards studying for their own interest. However, there is an extraordinary trend observed in terms of employer support for education. They tend to support younger as well as elder employees more than those who fall under middle age groups.
To begin with, 80% of students under 26 years of age study to develop a career for themselves. This trend of career-oriented education declines as the age progresses, and less than 20% of students over 49 years of age study for career progression. In contrast, only 10% of young students under 26 years of age educate themselves out of personal interest. But this interest grows as the age increases, to the extent that nearly 70% of students, who are older than 49 years, study for their own interest.
Furthermore, in terms of employer facilitation, maximum benefit is received by people under 26 years of age. This favor declines as the age progresses and hits the lowest point of 34% for the 30-39-year age group. After this, there is a gradual inclination in this support for the 40-49-year group, and it further increases to about 44% for people over 49 years of age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-13 | annatran12324 | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-28 | utkarshshahi | 73 | view |
| 2018-08-02 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 84 | view |
| 2017-06-21 | elirya | 78 | view |
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantage of charging people for admission to museum outweigh its advantage? 84
- The following is a diagram of a mobile phone recycling process.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The following is a diagram of mobile phone recycling process Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children’s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they receive from employers. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...education. They tend to support younger as well as elder employees more than those...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95564516129 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71530892818 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536290322581 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9545174997 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.727272727 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338644840134 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131889647452 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608401438241 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209555283766 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0444361736603 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.