The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph demonstrates some striking similarities between the birth rates of Chinese and US during the period from 1920 to 2000. It can be seen that both nations experienced remarkable fluctuations, with lows during the 1940s and highs during the 1990s.
Starting from 10 percent in 1930 then jumped to 15 percent in 1935, the figures of China then fell to just 5 percent in the 1940s. The numbers continue to rise, reaching a peak of 20 percent in 1950. China, however, went through the next 50 years with declining in this figure.
Birth rates in the US fluctuated between 11 and 13 before 1940, then dropped to less than 5 in 1945. In the next 5 years, the number rose to 15 percent, then followed by a sustained fall.
It can be noted that the birth rates were comparable prior to 1950, however the gap widened after fertility in China steadily decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Sang Dao | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | minhpencil | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | vuquenhu | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-12 | Tran Thi Ngan | 73 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | Tinh Cao Van | 61 | view |
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons ? Solutions to change negative attitudes 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 56
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69480519481 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48219328854 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62987012987 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 192.6 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.736343466 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141582032346 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590093185077 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678790356534 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0858483651752 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377882758472 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.