TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task
The lecture and the reading both discuss several methods to preserve the population of the frog which has declined. While the reading states some several methods to solve the problem, the lecture refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims the pesticides are harmful to the frog's population and the government has to define the law to decrease the using of these chemicals. However, the lecture argues that decreasing the use of pesticides is not economical and fair because the farmer uses these chemicals to compete with other farmers. Furthermore, if the farmer cannot use the pesticides they will lose a large number of crops and cannot compete in the market.
In addition, the reading makes the arguments that fungus causes the treatment in the frog's population and the fungus have to kill with heat. The lecture refutes this point by stating this treatment have to capture individually by each frog in the population again and again to have a great problem in the frog's population. According to the professor, using antifungal medication is not compelling and is expensive methods.
Ultimately, the reading passage argues that water habitat of the frog destroy by human activity, therefore, lakes and marshes have to protect. The lecture refutes this claim by pointing out global warming is a key element for disappearing the water and wetland. Moreover, the professor says prohibiting unlikely do not have an effect on the frog habitat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Hem | 3 | view |
| 2019-03-02 | fatimamsy | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-28 | mahi22 | 81 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | tabatabaei777 | 83 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | chensixian | 76 | view |
- The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 73
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO-44 - Integrated Writing Task 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...laims the pesticides are harmful to the frogs population and the government has to de...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...annot use the pesticides they will lose a large number of crops and cannot compete in the market....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...that fungus causes the treatment in the frogs population and the fungus have to kill ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'frogs'' or 'frog's'?
Suggestion: frogs'; frog's
...nd again to have a great problem in the frogs population. According to the professor,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14107883817 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65591932747 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51867219917 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2342152327 49.2860985944 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.636363636 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385981800018 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147911096736 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765444360574 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225023595028 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614847292725 0.0443174109184 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.