Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums play critical characters in cultivating historical interest and cultural beauty. In addition, they take responsibility in preserving precious collections and valuable antiques. Some are open to visitors for free of tickets, while others charge tourists for admission. In my opinion, entrance fee is reasonable for maintaining operations of museums.
Firstly, conserving historical items should be looked after with lots of efforts since they are easy to be destroyed with a little mistakes. Hence, museums should hire some experts who specialize in keep objects and introduce new facilities with a view to ensuring all of collections maintain in the best situations. This is why museums need so much money every year. Without revenue of tickets, it will be a heavy loading on finance of the government, yet there are many disable and helpless people desired to be assisted. As a result, museums should make profits by themselves.
Secondly, the amount of collections and exhibitions will increase as time goes by. According to this reason, space of museums should be extended in the future. For example, the National Palace Museum, which is the biggest museum in Taiwan, established a branch few years ago to store their collections and show them in front of more people. However, building new house or space needs a large number of expenditure. The most efficient way is charging visitors for admissions to fulfill the demand of finance.
In conclusion, in order to provide more excellent environment to visitors, entrance fee is indispensable as it will make museums to improve the quality of circumstance and maintain operations of whole museums, including staffs, electricity, rent, and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | benedetta | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | mickeybin2211 | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | cocococo123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compa 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and giv 78
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ever, building new house or space needs a large number of expenditure. The most efficient way is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33703703704 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97364048313 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2749089149 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206175855856 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660999583855 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0959761977981 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118660906021 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897212043193 0.056905535591 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.