Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
It is argued that films can be shown on induction technology products such as smart-phones or tablets. In my opinion, however, I believe that it is more entertained by watching films on the movie-theatre.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why people think that films can be watched on technology devices. The first reason is that people might save expenditures when they sign up for packages on websites, which provide various films and entertainment channels. The packages on these websites are more affordable for an individual since he pays monthly and watches a range of films. Take Netflix as an example. Its costs depend on which plans chosen, ranging from $9.99 to $13.99 for premium plan per month. However, if going to the cinema in United State, viewers will pay approximately $11.50 for each adult ticket. Another reason is that watching on smart-phone is more flexible than going to the cinema because people do not need to waste their time for waiting movie-picture show and movie schedule.
On the other hand, I believe that it is essential to watch movies on a huge screen in a movie theatre. It is unquestionable that sitting in front of the giant screen with lively sound will give audiences a sense of fun. Besides the 2D genre films, watching 3D genre movies is an enjoyable experience because viewers are provided glasses when purchasing tickets. Therefore, audiences might have feelings as a real life. Moreover, watching films on a cinema provides occupations for movie theatres employees which play a vital role in alleviating unemployment.
In conclusion, although some people think that films can be watched on technology devices. I personally believe that watching films on a cinema brings more fantastic feelings to viewers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Anathena | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | maria001 | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that we can use animals the way we want while others believe animals have rights and we must respect their rights What is your opinion Use specific reasons to support your point of view 79
- Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for, and allow theirchildren to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? Whatconsequences could this style of parenting have for children as they getolder? 67
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throwaway” society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away. What are its causes and what impacts can it have? 89
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07586206897 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82923417074 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.952877145 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196164276645 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683569132441 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623918335022 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14369801736 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570950694999 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.