The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.

The line graph illustrates the amount of energy consumed through fuel in the USA between 1980 and 2030, according to the 2008 investigation data. Units are measured as quadrillion Overall, it can depict that there are 6 different energy consumption, where the utilization of petrol and oil is the highest significant quadrillion, while the use of hydropower is the lowest number quadrillion.

To begin with, In 1980, the consumption of petrol and oil stood at 35q. Somehow, this figure had sharply declined in 1985 up to 33 units. Subsequently, this figure had shown slightly increased in 1990 up to approximately 35q. Thereafter, although this figure displayed plummeted in 1995 up to 33q, afterward this figure showed strikingly higher up to 40q in 2008 and then this trend also forecast to rise dramatically up to 48q across 50 years.

Likewise, it is worth to mention that the utilization of hydropower, nuclear and solar energy had shown a similar number of units around fourth quadrillion. Similarly, the consumption of coal and natural gas energy had the same amount of units in the year 1985, 1998 and 2015 up to 16, 22 and 24 (quadrillion units) and then till 2030, this outlines had predicate to be peaking up around 30 quadrillion units and constant stable around 24 quadrillion units respectively.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...had the same amount of units in the year 1985, 1998 and 2015 up to 16, 22 and 24 ...
^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'predicated'.
Suggestion: predicated
...s and then till 2030, this outlines had predicate to be peaking up around 30 quadrillion ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'predicated'.
Suggestion: predicated
...s and then till 2030, this outlines had predicate to be peaking up around 30 quadrillion ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound 24 quadrillion units respectively.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, then, while, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05529953917 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98067992992 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.7883307806 43.030603864 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.125 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0829304018866 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046010099357 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523081010512 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640549415161 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398633374041 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.