Government funding should only be provided for the best students as scholarships. Other funding of universities should come from student fees and private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, the receivers of government funding and sources of university funding are concerning a range of people. Some of them believe that funding from government should only be provided for the best students as scholarship, and other funding of universities should comes from student fees and private organizations. However, the fact should be the opposite.
To begin with, it is not a wise decision that only provide the best students with scholarship, which is coming from government funding. What comes to first, really outstanding students do not need to simulate themselves by scholarship. Actually, the majority of them restrict themselves with higher standard, and they do not really need anyone to exert pressure. Then scholarship seems meaningless for those students who are already outstanding. Karlie Kloss, a successful model who graduated from the University of New York, for instance. She used to say that she was studying really hard in order to perfect herself. Obviously, Karlie studies with clear goal, and she owns strong ability of self-management. That is why she can be such popular among all the models. Furthermore, students with poor studying talents are more need encouragement from teachers, because it could be hard for them to be enthusiastic on study.
There could be many drawbacks if other funding of universities comes from student fees and private organizations, because the fees may risen, and for those private organizations, they are suggested to donate their money or equipments to many other places that are more urgent. Rural areas, for example. Firstly, there are a lot of families lacking of money to support children to learn in universities. In that way, it even becomes harder for these children to be competitive when they are finding jobs in the future. Crime rate could be increased, and it is definitely a negative influence to society. Besides, so many human issues are still concerning human, so relatively, those private organizations are suggested to contribute more on these places. A case in point is that in Africa, residents in countries such us Kenya and Nigeria are threatened by illness and disease. Many NGOs are providing aims.
Undoubtedly, scholarship is not not suggested to only provide to those outstanding students. Besides, the sources of scholarship should not coming from student fees or any private governments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-07 | Shirley Lee | 86 | view |
- These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. Do you think this is a positive or a negative development? 11
- Government funding should only be provided for the best students as scholarships Other funding of universities should come from student fees and private organizations To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professionals. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair. Discuss both views and give your own answer. 78
- Some people think we should keep all the money we earn and not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- More and more schools allow fast food restaurant to sell their products to their students.Is it a positive or a negative development? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nding and sources of university funding are concerning a range of people. Some of them believe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
...nd other funding of universities should comes from student fees and private organizat...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'rise' or 'be risen'?
Suggestion: rise; be risen
...ate organizations, because the fees may risen, and for those private organizations, t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... society. Besides, so many human issues are still concerning human, so relatively, those private org...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hose private organizations are suggested to contribute more on these places. A ca...
^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...ng aims. Undoubtedly, scholarship is not not suggested to only provide to those outs...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'come'
Suggestion: come
..., the sources of scholarship should not coming from student fees or any private govern...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, still, then, thus, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29133858268 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97552377028 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50656167979 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.7562593124 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6363636364 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3181818182 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464770231589 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118775435957 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154332363769 0.0667982634062 231% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318963334371 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.175502187995 0.056905535591 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.