The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of males, females, and children consuming five servings of fruit and vegetables each day in 8 years from 2001 to 2008 in the UK.
It can be clearly seen that the highest percentage of all people consuming fruit and vegetables was women, while the children consistently accounted for the lowest proportion. Furthermore, there was a significant increase in the proportion of those eating these food items over the period.
Starting at just over 20% in 2001, the percentage of women who ate fruit and vegetables steadily went up to reach a peak of almost 35% in the year 2006. this figure then slightly declined to 30% in the final year.
In terms of men and children eating fruit and vegetables, the rate remained stable in the first three years from 2001 to 2003 (about 17% and 12% respectively). From this point, the proportion of men climbed gradually and peaked at around 28% in both 2006 and 2007 before falling to just over 25% in 2008. A similar trend of increase in the figure for children was evident reaching about 26% in 2007 and around 24% in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 78
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand, agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 54
- The maps below show a coal mine and its redevelopment into a visitor attraction site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... a peak of almost 35% in the year 2006. this figure then slightly declined to 30% in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75897435897 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57535990349 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574358974359 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9050050136 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249361515786 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10013612207 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109995333725 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165774258571 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102621527341 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.