Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best?
students can contribute to their society in various ways. they can come together and do small or big tasks which help their society to be a better place to live. when it comes to types of tasks which they can do some controversy arises and people propose different ideas. I believe making a house for people who cannot afford to buy or rent a house is a good idea. In the ensuing lines, I will explain two reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First, the biggest a contribution the more it affects society. Needless to say, building a house is a hard and time-consuming task, so when people see a group of young students dedicate their time to help others they will be encouraged to do the same. so effective is this indirect method of encouraging people that immediately others try to make various contributions, but not necessarily the same. In this way, others even may donate money for the new houses so it can become a trend and many poor people find a chance to have their own houses. Take me as an example, when I was a senior architecture student, I joined a summer program which was renewing house in poor areas. when we started our work, at first, it was unusual for local people but after several days some people asked to help us without being paid. we were going to renew 20 houses but many local people joined our team and we renewed over 80 houses which were remarkable.
Second, by making house students can gain different experience which is helpful for their future. If students work on such big projects, they will learn skills like planning, designing, accounting, etc. Rarely do students learn these skills at university so it can be a great opportunity for them to learn these skills in the real world. Despite the fact that building a house can be a difficult job, its benefits outweigh the drawbacks. Besides, this task can help students to find a paid job in the future. In the same project which I have mentioned before, I learned how to plan for big tasks and manage all aspects of it to avoid failure or costly loss. In addition, as my neighbors are aware of my experience, they call me to fix their houses when they have a problem, thus, I make a reasonable amount of money in this way.
In conclusion, based on aforementioned explanations and examples, I believe making a house for people in poverty can be a good project for students because it is a huge task they can encourage more people to help them; in addition, they can learn practical skills through these projects.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-08-23 | meliiw_amd | 95 | view |
2021-08-20 | hazrat | 81 | view |
2021-08-20 | hazrat | 81 | view |
2021-08-19 | meliiw_amd | 90 | view |
2021-08-19 | hazrat | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
- TPO 40.Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries. 88
- Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
students can contribute to their society in vari...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ibute to their society in various ways. they can come together and do small or big t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...r society to be a better place to live. when it comes to types of tasks which they c...
^^^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...they will be encouraged to do the same. so effective is this indirect method of en...
^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...which was renewing house in poor areas. when we started our work, at first, it was u...
^^^^
Line 2, column 818, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...le asked to help us without being paid. we were going to renew 20 houses but many ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...easonable amount of money in this way. In conclusion, based on aforementioned exp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58797327394 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5967902737 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501113585746 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7644314456 48.9658058833 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.45 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166986856762 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615001360538 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493658801012 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12932819997 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402065087154 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.