TPO 41. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.
There have been some moot points about whether teachers were more appreciated and valued by people than they are nowadays or not. The question of this matter has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. When it comes to my position, by weighing up all aspects, I strongly subscribe to the point that nowadays, teachers are less appreciated than the formerly. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that due to technology development, there are various ways for learning, therefore, the necessity to teachers decrease dramatically rather than the past. Children access to vast materials on the internet which help them to enhance their knowledge and boost their education. In this situation, tutors have few impacts on society. As a case to the viewpoint, I vividly remember when I was a student, I had not any second learning materials such as instructive books and applications. Thus, I required to have expertise teachers who have vast knowledge and ameliorate my education. On the other hand, today, my sister access to the vast helping materials. She can search for everything she needs on the internet, and find every book which she wants. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that nowadays presence of teachers diminish than formerly.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that owing to the increase in well-educated people. In each family, there are university graduate members. Hence, these persons can help children in their lessons. My personal example demonstrates this reality, when I was a student there was not any well-educated member in my family, therefore, I needed to ask my academic question from a teacher. However, my sister today find her answers by asking me. Because I am a civil engineer, I am strong in mathematics and physics. As a consequence, I can help my sister precisely. This action gives rise to she does not require to have a teacher for her academic difficulties. My personal example shed some light on the point that well-educated persons decrease the need for a teacher than the past time.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that nowadays the value of teachers diminish than the previous time. This issue not only stems from the advancement of technology but also due to the well-educated person in each family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | farzaddanaei | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Abbas.ghaffari | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Maryam Madson | 61 | view |
- Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
- Top 44 3
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurant. Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- How do movies or television influence people’s behavior? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 807, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...ecrease the need for a teacher than the past time. To wrap it up, according to the afor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, such as, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2057.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09158415842 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96302223823 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524752475248 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6529411692 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4347826087 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5652173913 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123788126049 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341974246095 0.076458572812 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0613606446933 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902243422798 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630656031532 0.0645574589148 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.